{
  "schema": "scanovich.decision_packet.v1",
  "provenance": {
    "publisher": "Scanovich",
    "information_provider": "Scanovich",
    "commercial_relationship": "first_party",
    "independently_verified": false
  },
  "updated_at": "2026-08-09",
  "ontology_ref": "https://scanovich.ai/ai/ontology.json",
  "note": "Decision Packets are trade-live offers. Broader capabilities live in ontology.json with evidence_status. buyer_language_bridges map natural buyer queries to honest fit/unfit (AW-006).",
  "packets": [
    {
      "id": "trade.supplier_normalization",
      "problem": "AI for customs / broker document prep when supplier SKU data is incomplete, inconsistent, or multi-format before classification — need a normalized, source-traced registry for human review",
      "buyer": [
        "import operator",
        "trade compliance",
        "customs broker",
        "principal office",
        "teams searching for customs document AI without autonomous filing"
      ],
      "inputs": [
        "xlsx",
        "csv",
        "pdf",
        "supplier catalogue",
        "invoice",
        "packing list"
      ],
      "outputs": [
        "normalized registry",
        "classification candidate",
        "source trace",
        "human review queue"
      ],
      "constraints": {
        "final_human_review": true,
        "public_saas": false,
        "autonomous_legal_determination": false,
        "replaces_broker": false
      },
      "fit_when": [
        "documents carry regulatory or personal liability",
        "outputs must be explainable and source-backed",
        "engagement can be scoped under NDA",
        "buyer needs supporting diligence for a broker or compliance signatory"
      ],
      "unfit_when": [
        "buyer wants fully autonomous customs filing without human sign-off",
        "buyer wants self-serve public SaaS seats",
        "buyer needs free pilot or open-ended unpaid evaluation"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "customs_dossier",
        "home_exhibit_a"
      ],
      "contact_action": {
        "action": "request_scoping_review",
        "url": "https://scanovich.ai/?source=agent-web&utm_source=agent-web&utm_medium=machine&utm_campaign=aw-003#contact",
        "mailto": "mailto:private@scanovich.ai?subject=Scanovich%20%E2%80%94%20access%20request%20(agent-web)"
      },
      "updated_at": "2026-08-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "trade.hs_tnved_explainable",
      "problem": "HS code AI / explainable HS / TN VED classification candidates with rationale a customs broker or compliance lead can defend — not autonomous determination",
      "buyer": [
        "trade compliance",
        "customs broker",
        "import ops lead"
      ],
      "inputs": [
        "normalized product rows",
        "supporting certificates",
        "prior declarations when available"
      ],
      "outputs": [
        "classification candidate",
        "GRI-style rationale",
        "certification flags",
        "audit trail"
      ],
      "constraints": {
        "final_human_review": true,
        "public_saas": false,
        "replaces_broker": false
      },
      "fit_when": [
        "classification errors create regulatory or margin exposure",
        "a named person must sign or stand behind the file",
        "buyer searched for customs document AI but needs human-defendable output"
      ],
      "unfit_when": [
        "buyer expects Scanovich to file declarations autonomously",
        "buyer wants a universal document AI without scoped trade context"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "customs_dossier",
        "customs_benchmark_note"
      ],
      "contact_action": {
        "action": "request_scoping_review",
        "url": "https://scanovich.ai/customs/?source=agent-web&utm_source=agent-web&utm_medium=machine&utm_campaign=aw-003#contact",
        "mailto": "mailto:private@scanovich.ai?subject=Scanovich%20%E2%80%94%20trade%20document%20intelligence%20brief%20(agent-web)"
      },
      "updated_at": "2026-08-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "trade.conflicting_evidence_diligence",
      "problem": "conflicting invoice, packing list, catalog, or category feed values — need policy-aware authority resolution and an auditable recommendation before import",
      "buyer": [
        "customs broker",
        "import ops lead",
        "trade compliance",
        "principal office facing high-stakes evidence conflict"
      ],
      "inputs": [
        "xlsx",
        "pdf",
        "json feed",
        "invoice",
        "packing list",
        "written policy"
      ],
      "outputs": [
        "authority-ranked answer",
        "source conflict map",
        "review-ready recommendation",
        "audit trail"
      ],
      "constraints": {
        "final_human_review": true,
        "public_saas": false,
        "replaces_broker": false,
        "newest_file_wins": false
      },
      "fit_when": [
        "sources disagree and file recency is not the authority rule",
        "stakes require a signed recommendation rather than a chat summary",
        "buyer wants research-grade evidence challenge methods applied to trade ops"
      ],
      "unfit_when": [
        "buyer wants autonomous filing or broker replacement",
        "buyer wants a public leaderboard product or free unlimited scoring API"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "customs_dossier",
        "ec001_research"
      ],
      "contact_action": {
        "action": "request_scoping_review",
        "url": "https://scanovich.ai/customs/?source=agent-web&utm_source=agent-web&utm_medium=machine&utm_campaign=aw-003#contact",
        "mailto": "mailto:private@scanovich.ai?subject=Scanovich%20%E2%80%94%20conflicting%20trade%20evidence%20review%20(agent-web)"
      },
      "updated_at": "2026-08-09"
    }
  ],
  "buyer_language_bridges": [
    {
      "id": "blb.ai_tools_customs_brokers",
      "buyer_query": "AI tools for customs brokers",
      "bridge": "We do not replace the broker or file autonomously. We help when supplier or trade files conflict and a signed, auditable recommendation is required — private practice, not public SaaS seats. Live proof: /customs/.",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "customs_dossier",
        "ec001_research"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "blb.customs_document_ai",
      "buyer_query": "customs document AI",
      "bridge": "Private document intelligence for import dossiers — Exhibit A at /customs/. Explainable HS / TN VED candidates with human sign-off; not a self-serve filing bot.",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "customs_dossier",
        "home_exhibit_a"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "blb.conflicting_invoice_packing",
      "buyer_query": "conflicting invoice and packing list",
      "bridge": "Authority resolution under policy, not “newest file wins.” Research demo: Evidence Challenge EC-001 (/research/agent-web/evidence-challenge/). Commercial path: scoped review via /customs/ contact.",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ec001_research",
        "customs_dossier"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "blb.hs_code_ai",
      "buyer_query": "HS code AI",
      "bridge": "Human-defendable classification candidates with cited rationale — not autonomous legal determination. Broker or compliance signatory remains accountable. Packet: trade.hs_tnved_explainable.",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "customs_dossier",
        "customs_benchmark_note"
      ]
    }
  ]
}