A senior specialist should not spend three days assembling the goods description from a factory pack.

AI prepares a review queue: name, goods description, HS / TN VED candidate, a gap, a question for the plant. Duty and delay stay with the specialist. The dirty reconstruction does not.

Review of one machine pack. Sum in the email. Reply tomorrow. No files on this site.

Illustrative · not a client file; no client names
Input
“VMC, 3-axis, 800×400 mm, 7.5 kW”
Missing
mains supply / machine passport / tooling set — not in the supplier line
Sources reconciledGap: passport / supplyTR CU: insufficient evidenceQuestion for the plantHeading candidate
HS / TN VED
8457 · machining centres · candidate

not enough evidence for a full code

State
needs review

From supplier chaos to a human review queue.

  1. 01Supplier chaos
  2. 02Structured record
  3. 03Reviewed name translation
  4. 04Goods description for the declaration
  5. 05Classification assistant
  6. 06Specialist signature

Broker and importer processes differ. The shared work is reconstructing someone else’s pack. The code comes after that, not instead of it.

Typical inputs: Excel, PDF, invoices, packing lists, technical docs, images, certificates, descriptions in Chinese, English and Russian. Not “any file”.

Why we do not take the file on this site.

They ask for the cloud and promise minus 80% of the time. We do not take the file on this website. The lever: the specialist signs, instead of assembling the spreadsheet.

This is the queue a specialist can sign.

Illustrative · not a client file; no client names
Input
“VMC, 3-axis, 800×400 mm, 7.5 kW”
Name
vertical machining centre, 3-axis, 800×400 mm table, 7.5 kW
Goods description
Vertical machining centre, 3-axis, 800×400 mm table, 7.5 kW
Missing
mains supply / machine passport / tooling set — not in the supplier line
Sources reconciledGap: passport / supplyTR CU: insufficient evidenceQuestion for the plantHeading candidate
HS / TN VED
8457 · machining centres · candidate

not enough evidence for a full code

Question for the plant
Please send the machine passport and power schematic — not in the supplier line.
Certification
EAEU TR 010/2011 — insufficient evidence, requires clarification
Sources
EAEU TN VED, Chapter 84 · TR CU 010 scope — passport and supply not attested in this row
State
needs review
Illustrative · not a client file; no client names
Input
“CNC lathe, 2-axis, Ø400×750 mm, 11 kW”
Name
CNC lathe, 2-axis, Ø400×750 mm, 11 kW
Goods description
CNC lathe, 2-axis, max. machining Ø 400 mm, 750 mm between centres, 11 kW
Missing
machine passport / hydraulics schematic / chuck jaws — not in the supplier line
Sources reconciledGap: passport / hydraulicsTR CU: insufficient evidenceQuestion for the plantHeading candidate
HS / TN VED
8458 · lathes · candidate

not enough evidence for a full code

Question for the plant
Please send the machine passport and hydraulics schematic — not in the supplier line.
Certification
EAEU TR 010/2011 — insufficient evidence, requires clarification
Sources
EAEU TN VED, Chapter 84 · TR CU 010 scope — passport and hydraulics not attested in this row
State
needs review

What happens after you write.

  1. 01A reply within one business day
  2. 02Pack review after the reply — not in this form
  3. 03If the flow repeats — the next step in the email

Contact.

Email or Telegram. Not self-serve and not customs filing. No files on this step.

Where responsibility sits.

Scanovich prepares reviewable material: sources, gaps, a supplier question, and an HS / TN VED candidate. The client’s specialist confirms the code. We do not file declarations.