Evidence-grounded systems for workflows where an error has a cost.

Scanovich is founder-led applied research and engineering: provenance, checks, and a person who signs. What exists today is prototypes and demonstrations — not customer deployments.

Explore the researchDiscuss an evaluation

Files are not accepted on this website. A commercial step comes later, after a technical evaluation.

Demonstration · not a client file; no client names
Input
“VMC, 3-axis, 800×400 mm, 7.5 kW”
Missing
mains supply / machine passport / tooling set — not in the supplier line
Sources reconciledGap: passport / supplyTR CU: insufficient evidenceQuestion for the plantCode candidate
HS / TN VED
8457 · machining centres · candidate

not enough evidence for a full code

State
needs review

Trust is built around the model, not inside it.

  1. 01Messy input
  2. 02Structured record
  3. 03Sources and gaps
  4. 04A check, not a guess
  5. 05A candidate, not a decision
  6. 06A human signature

A model’s intelligence is not trust in the answer. Trust is the architecture: a source, an explicit gap, and a place where a person decides.

The prototype is built for Excel, PDF, invoices, packing lists, technical docs, images, certificates, and descriptions in Chinese, English and Russian. Not every file that happens to arrive.

Why this site does not accept a file.

The page shows a demonstration. It does not take someone else’s pack. A file does not land here. Other people’s “minus 80% of the time” is not our result.

What exists today.

Working prototype · trade documents

A demonstration: a supplier line becomes a reviewed name, a goods description, a code candidate, and an explicit gap. Not a broker deployment and not someone’s file.

Research prototype · trace and abstain

If the evidence is missing, the record says so. It does not invent the rest. A legally binding decision is not handed to the model.

Demonstration · two equipment rows

Headings 8457 and 8458 show a class of goods. Not a ten-digit code and not a client invoice.

This site does not claim customers, revenue, or completed deployments. The marketplace surface stays off the storefront.

This is a demonstration record.

Demonstration · not a client file; no client names
Input
“VMC, 3-axis, 800×400 mm, 7.5 kW”
Name
vertical machining centre, 3-axis, 800×400 mm table, 7.5 kW
Goods description
Vertical machining centre, 3-axis, 800×400 mm table, 7.5 kW
Missing
mains supply / machine passport / tooling set — not in the supplier line
Sources reconciledGap: passport / supplyTR CU: insufficient evidenceQuestion for the plantCode candidate
HS / TN VED
8457 · machining centres · candidate

not enough evidence for a full code

Question for the plant
Please send the machine passport and power schematic — not in the supplier line.
Certification
EAEU TR 010/2011 — insufficient evidence, requires clarification
Sources
EAEU TN VED, Chapter 84 · TR CU 010 scope — passport and supply not attested in this row
State
needs review
Demonstration · not a client file; no client names
Input
“CNC lathe, 2-axis, Ø400×750 mm, 11 kW”
Name
CNC lathe, 2-axis, Ø400×750 mm, 11 kW
Goods description
CNC lathe, 2-axis, max. machining Ø 400 mm, 750 mm between centres, 11 kW
Missing
machine passport / hydraulics schematic / chuck jaws — not in the supplier line
Sources reconciledGap: passport / hydraulicsTR CU: insufficient evidenceQuestion for the plantCode candidate
HS / TN VED
8458 · lathes · candidate

not enough evidence for a full code

Question for the plant
Please send the machine passport and hydraulics schematic — not in the supplier line.
Certification
EAEU TR 010/2011 — insufficient evidence, requires clarification
Sources
EAEU TN VED, Chapter 84 · TR CU 010 scope — passport and hydraulics not attested in this row
State
needs review

A possible path, not a project history.

  1. 01A technical evaluation: whether the problem fits
  2. 02A bounded review only after a reply, not in this form
  3. 03A license or an install in your environment — if the evaluation holds

Evaluation.

Leave an email or Telegram. This is a conversation about a technical evaluation, not a desk and not customs filing. No files on this step. We do not claim completed deployments.

Where responsibility sits.

The prototype prepares reviewable material: sources, gaps, a supplier question, and an HS / TN VED candidate. If a filing decision is ever made, a specialist makes it. We do not file declarations. There are no customer deployments.