Principals & family offices
Multi-entity holdings, personal exposure on signed documents, and offices that need a named practice — not a vendor seat model.
Request private scoping reviewFor operators, principals and compliance-heavy teams — explainable, auditable outputs with human sign-off before anything becomes final.
File № SCN-2026-01 · Restricted circulation
A private practice · By introduction and qualification
Cross-border trade · Marketplace operations · Multi-entity group ops
What it does
A proprietary engine ingests operational documents inside your boundary and returns structured, explainable outputs — each row traceable to sources, each release gated by a named signatory. Vertical deployments (trade, marketplaces) are proof on the same architecture, not separate products.
Illustrative output
Position of the practice
Who should enter
Multi-entity holdings, personal exposure on signed documents, and offices that need a named practice — not a vendor seat model.
Request private scoping reviewSupplier files, explainable HS / TN VED, certification flags, and declaration workflows where someone must defend the output.
Exhibit A · full fileSKU-level unit economics as a live proof surface — briefing and qualification on EN; not self-serve checkout on this layer.
Exhibit B · briefing gateClause extraction, obligation mapping, and review packs where counsel or compliance must trace every recommendation to a source.
Scope a redacted sampleThe asset
Ingest → extract and normalize → retrieve precedent → explainable structured output → human sign-off → optional private deploy. Vertical products are wedges and proof on the same architecture — not separate experiments.
Proprietary asset of the practice — annex to the file.
Terms of engagement
Async brief plus process and data-sensitivity review — fit confirmed before any call.
Thin slice on redacted samples under NDA; before/after metrics, an agreed review window, and a written commercial frame — scoping review → paid pilot → private deployment, not public SaaS tiers on EN.
Licensed system in your boundary — explainable, auditable, operator-in-the-loop.
Optional call only after fit is confirmed.
Trade operators: full deployment dossier at scanovich.ai/customs/
Deployment map
Explainable classification under NDA — import ops, brokers, compliance.
Proof surface (Yandex.Market); additional fee models under contract.
Precedent layer on redacted DT archives — meaning, not filenames.
Source-attributed retrieval on indexed material — not generative counsel. Scoped pilot.
Structured extraction and gap review on technical annexes.
Consolidated review-ready structures and audit trail across entities.
Vertical modules share one governed engine — not separate experiments.
Cross-border trade
Cross-border trade document intelligence: supplier normalization, explainable HS / TN VED classification, and certification requirement detection — deployed under NDA for import ops, brokers, and compliance teams.
Wrong classification and inconsistent supplier data create regulatory and margin exposure — someone has to defend the file.
Illustrative classification output sits in the preview above — the trade dossier carries the full annotated sample with GRI trace and certification flags.
Full trade dossierMarketplace economics
SKU-level profit after fees, logistics, and ad spend — live for Yandex.Market; the same engine extends to additional fee models under contract. Proof surface, not the primary engagement path.
Marketplace proof surfaceProprietary IP — available under license and NDA after qualification.
From the principal of the practice
Every output this engine produces was designed to survive one test: a person with authority signs it, and stands behind it. That standard is mine before it is the system’s. If your office runs documents that carry that weight, request access — I review every brief myself.

Aleksandr Mordvinov
Principal of the practice